![black gay sex black man would be be seeings rough a train black gay sex black man would be be seeings rough a train](https://brooklynrail-web.imgix.net/article_image/image/27500/scott-heins-gothamist-new-york-city-may-30-2020.jpg)
Thus, just as it is not illegal to have a car – so long as you buy insurance for it – it will not be illegal (yet) to own a gun.
![black gay sex black man would be be seeings rough a train black gay sex black man would be be seeings rough a train](https://thenib.imgix.net/usq/c0929928-efef-4888-b635-9d91d605a1f7/6b19c21b-0fa1-4bf4-ade6-cf94dfc63c07.jpeg)
The same arguments will be used – because they’ve already been accepted. Just as car owners are required to buy insurance just as we are soon to be forced to buy health insurance. It will be argued that anyone who possesses a gun must also possess insurance. Not seeing that if the government can ban (or control or regulate) this than it certainly can ban, control or regulate that. They – most people – never see that an attack on anyone’s rights is an attack on their rights.They are easily gulled by their moralistic fetishes – their disapproval of some concrete thing other people do which they don’t like. So their rights were not on the table (foolish them). The assault on smoking (and lately, soft drinks) should have alerted people – but as with “sobriety checkpoints,” most people readily supported the imposition of massive taxes on smokers because, after all, it is unhealthy to smoke. Self-defense will not be considered a legitimate purpose.īut the big one – tied to Obamacare – will be the transformation of gun ownership into a public health issue. And only if you have a “legitimate” purpose. Next, they’ll lobby for a new law (or just issue a fatwa) that makes it much harder to get a CC permit. How many millions of Clovers would support a ban? Or which looks “military.” Think how the ground has already been ceded by mainstream “gun rights” groups like the NRA – which invariably talk about “sportsmen” and “hunting.” Who needs an AR-15 (or Sig 220) to hunt? So easy to demagogue anything with, say, a high-capacity magazine. They will target not guns – just dangerous guns. So, instead, they will first pass “reasonable” restrictions. No sudden, mass ban or attempt at confiscation – because that would probably lead to open violence on a large scale and they – people like Dear Leader Obama and his Vyshinsky, AG Eric Holder, know this. This is how the citizens of the United States will be disarmed. It is a matter of getting them – getting us – to tolerate “A” so that “B” will be accepted in turn. Nor rendition, torture as policy – and presidential kill lists. We didn’t get to legal strip searches for jaywalking or littering in one fell swoop. The same process works just as well when it comes to dismantling due process – and removing limits on what the government may not do to us. Accept that – and something like Gate Rape is inevitable. And no, the terrr attacks of nineleven did not “change everything.” Getting people to accept “sobriety checkpoints” beginning around 1980 changed everything.
![black gay sex black man would be be seeings rough a train black gay sex black man would be be seeings rough a train](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-1500w,f_auto,q_auto:best/newscms/2014_31/597111/lucina_6-18-14_0547.jpg)
Something like the TSA would simply not have been tolerated if it came out of the blue sky circa 1980. Think how Americans have been habituated to arbitrary search and seizure. The final surrender is met with a shrug rather than a scream of outrage. When the circle finally closes and their rights no longer exist at all, they hardly notice – because by that time, most of their rights have already been taken. For gradually habituating them to an ever-diminishing circle of liberty. Incrementalism has proved depressingly effective as a tool for getting most people to quietly surrender their rights piecemeal.